Why Romance
I love to
read and I’m not picky about what I read. Other than L’Amour-esque westerns
(snore) and non-fiction (kill me now!), I’ll read just about everything. I’ve
got some good old fashioned bodice rippers on the same shelf with John Grisham,
Stephen King, Agatha Christie, Shakespeare, John Steinbeck, Nora Roberts, Douglas
Adams, Mary Higgins Clark, Frances Hodgson Burnett, David Gemmell and Margaret
Mitchell. My collection and my tastes are eclectic. But when I write, I prefer
to write romance.
I love ‘em.
And one of the things I love best about them is you can take every single genre
of fiction imaginable and merge them with romance. Political thriller and
romance? That works. And so does everything else: suspense, western, sci-fi, horror,
paranormal, historical, you name it.
Then there
are the characters. You have to have at least three: a heroine, a hero and a
villain. For the record, I’ve never been a fan of damsels that can’t help
themselves (even as a small child I never understood why seemingly capable and
allegedly intelligent women just stood there waiting for someone to save them.
Our entire race is hard-wired for fight or flight except when a damsel is in
distress? That particular breed is genetically predisposed to just wring their
hands woefully? And that’s a rant for another blog. My apologies), I prefer a
heroine that is strong, inside and out. And I love myself some knights in shining
armor, cowboys with dusty boots, bad boys with broken hearts and leather
jackets, bounty hunters, demon slayers, honestly I’m not picky about my heroes just
like I’m not picky about my sub-genres. Finally, I like my villains to be BAD.
Finally, no
matter all the rest you get a happily ever after. Happily ever after in a world where there are
so rarely any.
Yeah, you
can’t go wrong with that.
Comments
Post a Comment